size: 707872 sha1: f0b45626412142902b2105e918bf2442018dd58e sha256: a61a29cd292be1109ab93bac3f9c52d0c5d1a80ab0dea26a887d5b32022a455c
size: 644155 sha1: 7890da65f60eb7c0abf6db1f156e60ea0007e1f5 sha256: c001efdd0ccc2bbddaf510210091ae07d5512038a038335d84bb4f74d4092a59
What was written was obviously false. I am not a geologist but I know it’s sandstone and not granite. If you search for the title on bing, it looks like the text is a cut and paste from pinterest. If windows spotlight is there to promote bing, it doesn’t say much for the reliability of the information you get from it.
The title is wrong, in two ways.
Firstly, Wüstenquell Guestfarm is nowhere near Karibib, which is 50 MILES to the northeast, so take “Karibib” out of the title. It’s not the closest town (many other towns are closer), so there’s no relation.
Secondly, if those rocks are “granite”, I’m a horse. Granite is a hard gray smooth rock that’s NOT easily sculpted by desert winds. That’s sandstone, not granite. So take the “granite” out of the title.
So, the title should be: “Eagle Rock in Namib Desert, near Wüstenquell Guestfarm, Erongo, Namibia”
whats your problem its a mistake everyone makes them
Thank you for that clarification. I just saw the word Granite and as a geologist, it piqued my interest! You are correct. Granite would not wear down like that. The rock here is clearly sandstone.